
 |
Email
jnewhouse@radiologyweb.com
Academic Affiliation
Columbia University
College of Physicians and Surgeons
New York, New York
Current Position
Vice-Chairman, Department of Radiology
Director, Division of Abdominal Radiology
College of Physicians and Surgeons
New York, New York
Current Academic Appointment
Professor of Radiology and Urology
Area of Specialty/Interest
Uroradiology
Date of Birth
December 10, 1942
Education
B.A. Princeton University
M.D. Harvard Medical School
Latest Publications
Lee N, Newhouse JH, Schiff PB, Bagiella E, Malysko BK, Ennis RD. Which patients
with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need a computed tomography scan of
the abdomen? An analysis based on 588 patients. Urology. In press.
Newhouse JH, Heffess CS, Wagner BJ, Imray TJ, Adair CF, Davidson AJ. Large
degenerated adrenal adenomas: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology.
1999;210:385-391.
Lawton CA, Grignon D, Newhouse JH, Schellhammer PF, Kuban DA. Oncodiagnosis
panel: 1997 - Prostatic carcinoma. Radiographics. 1999;19, 185-203.
Newhouse JH, Wagner BJ. Renal oncocytoma. Abdominal Imaging. 1998;23:249-255.
Personal Statement
"Having had the good fortune to be associated
with two superb urology departments in my academic practice, I have
been a uroradiologist for my entire professional career, and now
hold joint appointments in radiology and urology. This association
has led me to be convinced that the best clinical radiology is made
possible through close and continual association with our referring
clinicians. Certainly it is often true that a short written interpretation
of a radiologic exam is all that is needed for the best clinical
patient management, but on many occasions clinicians face dilemmas
which require serious discussions with us in order to choose the
right path. The more familiar we are with the specific diagnostic
and therapeutic decisions they face, the better we serve them and
their patients.
"To be effective, our consultations require that we know more
than standard radiology and more than basic clinical medicine. We
need to be critical consumers of our research literature. As technological
advances continue to outstrip outcome and utility studies, we need
to continually evaluate the real utility - and the occasional inutility
- of the studies we must choose among, and of the information they
provide. We need to know how to manage uncertainty in making clinical
decisions, since uncertainty will certainly visit us often. We need
to step into the shoes of the physicians who face the patient, and,
if we can, into the shoes of the patients themselves, for often
the wishes and emotions of the patients are the answers to diagnostic
uncertainty. Finally, we need to teach these habits to our trainees
and successors: As they deal with the volume and fascination of
the science they must master, they need always to remember the patients
who yield the pictures."
|